However, due to modern alternatives, all animal testing is completely nonessential. Getting rid of animal testing is severe. The other methods of sampling such as cell cultures and human tissue sampling, are great new tools that have been created, but still do not yield the same results as animal testing. I will be presenting different views concerning animal testing. Would they really be happy as opposed to emotionless? Without animal research, many human beings would now be dead.
Humane Society International compared a variety of animal tests with their in vitro counterparts and found animal tests were more expensive in every scenario studied. Animal, Animal rights, Animal testing 573 Words 3 Pages Holly Mauch Sue Vander Hook Eng. What about trends over time? Living systems like human beings and animals are extremely complex. A rabbit for example, wouldn't feel tortured. Thus, it should also be the same with animal testing on cosmetics.
Only 6% of 4,300 international companies involved in drug development have registered a new drug with the U. Animal testing is a cruel way of trying to find results that aren't always trustworthy. Animal Liberation Front, Animal rights, Animal testing 2036 Words 6 Pages Issues related to animal experimentation are frequently discussed these days, particularly in the media. Although animal testing brings more medical progression without practicing on humans, its results vary compared to humans, and it is an implementation of animal cruelty. These methods are new, and have not been perfected yet.
I know, for sure, I would never want to put any animal through these horrible experiments. It does not work as individual cells. Through the use of animal testing, insulin was produced and we now have treatment for Type 1 diabetes. Technology is advancing everyday, but computers are limited by their abilities. Attitudes regarding the use of animals for student dissection are less clear given there are fewer surveys of those audiences.
One philosophical position actually accepts those consequences and argues that those humans have the exact same rights or lack of rights as non-human animals. I believe that animal testing is unethical unless it is used for good reasons, such as finding cures for diseases. They define how things are according to the rules. If we granted animals rights, all humans would have to become vegetarians, and hunting would need to be outlawed. These policies eliminate the unfair treatment section of the debate, because under them the animals will never be treated unfairly. In vitro in glass testing, such as studying cell cultures in a petri dish, can produce more relevant results than animal testing because human cells can be used. Quite simply put, the technology needed to take animal testing out of the equation does not yet exist.
This process of testing however, is the subject of an overbearing movement dedicated to hinder the great progress that has been made. They should use prisoners who have been convicted of murder or rape instead. In 1966, the Animal Welfare Act was abolished to regulate the treatment of animals. Millions of animals suffer from experimentation each year, but that number is not even precise since there are several countries that do not publish their data. But as the animals adapt to their surroundings, poisons must be strengthened, and have flaws altered.
I think it is completely and absolutely. Does the sight of a pretty female cause your natural sexual urges to reverse themselves? People have many different arguments both for and against it. Several people may argue that scientist are putting the lives of animals in danger by testing on them, on the other hand, is animal lives valued over human lives? Whether it is referred to as animal testing, animal experimentation or animal research, it means the experimentation carried out on animals. Introduction The practice of experimenting on animals has always been controversial. Thank you for subscribing We have more newsletters See our Could not subscribe, try again later Invalid Email We ask two experts for their arguments for and against animal testing. In this case, we cannot say who is right and who is wrong. Therefore, that will be giving unreliable results to be passed on for further experimentation.
The scientific establishment has a lot of inertia in favor of continuing the use of animals in research, but is slowly shifting towards alternatives. Many animals replicate the human body pretty well, and through this they are able to see how the drug will react if it is placed into a human host. Animal, Animal rights, Animal testing 1872 Words 6 Pages of medical progress. In this essay, I will highlight both sides of the argument giving equal weight to each, in an attempt to address some of the issues arising from this topical subject. Technology I feel as though your argument here is flawed. Thousands of species become extinct naturally.
Both sides have excellent points that they attempt to bring across to prove they are right; however, the pro side has one fact that the con side cannot ignore. Many people argue that humanity and science would not be where anywhere near where it is today if it were not for animal experimentation However, with advancements in medical and scientific technology, animal testing is no longer a defensible practice. These methods of testing today result in the deaths of millions of innocent animals every year. Pro I would like to thank my opponent for posting such an interesting debate topic! Additionally, well designed studies and appropriate statistical analysis of data can minimize the number of animals required for results. By testing on animals, we ensure that the drug will not have adverse effects on the humans it is testing on.