This allows you to gain a more objective perspective on your ideas. No matter what the topic is. In both cases, you will be contacted by the preferred method email or phone that you specified in your profile. You need to be careful and accurate not to miss any important details. Could I replicate the results using the information in the Methods and the description of the analysis? For more insight into how to conduct a review Mike Blades, Editor of Applied Spectroscopy, has written a blog post about peer review for Peer Review Week 2017 entitled ''. Such elements of the content as critical facts and statistics are crucial for your article review.
It is possible for a review article itself to be peer-reviewed or non-peer-reviewed. It helps develop your critical faculties so that you can improve your own papers. Then, throughout, if what I am reading is only partly comprehensible, I do not spend a lot of energy trying to make sense of it, but in my review I will relay the ambiguities to the author. You might address issues such as the significance of the contribution, quality and thoroughness of the analysis, clarity of presentation, practical importance, originality, depth and appropriateness for the Journal. If you're eligible to participate, you may be contacted by a nurse or study coordinator. Writing a good review requires expertise in the field, an intimate knowledge of research methods, a critical mind, the ability to give fair and constructive feedback, and sensitivity to the feelings of authors on the receiving end.
I also try to cite a specific factual reason or some evidence for any major criticisms or suggestions that I make. After noting the new information, the reader is supposed to look up the meaning of the phrases, words and read up on the concepts that have been presented in the article. I should also have a good idea of the hypothesis and context within the first few pages, and it matters whether the hypothesis makes sense or is interesting. An article review is a piece of writing where you summarize and assess someone else's article. Conclusion Evaluate the overall contribution that the text has made to your understanding of the topic and maybe its importance to the development of knowledge in this particular area or discipline, setting it in the context of other writings in the field. The Comments to the Authors should also not contain any semblance of a recommended rejection or acceptance of the manuscript.
Most journal articles include a review of existing literature early on and, throughout, cite previous scholarly work. I try to be as constructive as possible. Too may promising scientists have only a rudimentary grasp of grammar and punctuation that result in meandering commas, clauses in complex sentences that are struggling to find their verbs, and adjectives or even nouns that remain quite ambiguous about their antecedents in the sentence. Do not put in any information that is known to professionals in the field or topic but detail any conclusions the work came to. A quality review should note the strengths as well as the weaknesses of the manuscript. In addition to considering their overall quality, sometimes figures raise questions about the methods used to collect or analyze the data, or they fail to support a finding reported in the paper and warrant further clarification. Good review methods are critical because they provide an unbiased point of view for the reader regarding the current literature.
Then, I divide the review in two sections with bullet points, first listing the most critical aspects that the authors must address to better demonstrate the quality and novelty of the paper and then more minor points such as misspelling and figure format. Check whether it sounds eye-catching. In an example the reference to an article home terrorism may be cited as follows: Park, S. Step-by-step guide on article review writing 2. Does the author use standard scientific abbreviations? The reading may be too large sometimes, so students try to skip this critical step.
Key steps in beginning your review To begin the task, you need to read and critically analyse the article. When critically analysing the text, consider how it relates to your course materials, to the other articles or books that you have been reading and the lecture material. Narrative reviews are written in an easily readable format, and allow consideration of the subject matter within a large spectrum. Please ensure that comments are detailed and clear and that they are constructive in nature, even if you are recommending that the paper be rejected. In this post, I explain how I usually go about doing a peer review.
She Tweets as tanyagolashboza and has her own. Basically, you just put the information you have just read in your own words. Facebook 1 Twitter 0 Google+ 0 Viber WhatsApp How To Write An Article Review An article review essay is a or in a given field through making summary of the article in question, comparison or classification. However it is risky to make a decision based on the votes of absolute majority. In my field, authors are under pressure to broadly sell their work, and it's my job as a reviewer to address the validity of such claims. They are asked to assess whether it appears to be correct, judging with the best of their ability.
Do you have to be an expert in the subject of the article? You are expected to assess the main theme, its supporting arguments, and the perspectives for further research in the given direction. When the reviewer negatively evaluates different aspects of a paper, he or she should keep in mind that there are many ways to communicate this to the authors. If it is not published but you wish to use it, you need to contact the author e. An introduction names only the main point - thesis. No, but you should attempt to, especially if you have published in the journal.
A bad review is superficial, nasty, petty, self-serving, or arrogant. Sometimes, there may be three or four main points, not just one. Critical issues in research data, which are considered to be major flaws can be related to insufficient data points, statistically non-significant variations and unclear data tables. Write your conclusion The conclusion is usually one paragraph long and takes no more than 10% of your article review. It is the Editor's responsibility to make the final decision and also to decide on the best way to communicate that decision to the authors. Otherwise, leave it a few days or a week and come back to it. After that, I check whether all the experiments and data make sense, paying particular attention to whether the authors carefully designed and performed the experiments and whether they analyzed and interpreted the results in a comprehensible way.