Spielvogel, 2007 Life of Napoleon Bonaparte Arguably one of the most brilliant… 620 Words 3 Pages Napoleon was one of the most important figures in European history. Napoleon: Hero Persuasive Essay A hero is someone who has a vision for a better future, acts on their visions, and has the perseverance to get through obstacles. Weil has them perfectly brought out : the Hegelian State is an hereditary and constitutional monarchy. For example he allows the nobles and the church state back in France after he was crowned emperor, but they have no power and right over the rest of the people. Besides, time was of the essence. He put aban to sevral news papers.
For example he adopted a set of laws called the Napoleonic Code. Napoleon is considered one of the greatest commanders in history—his campaigns are studied at military schools worldwide. Napoleon's public works projects erected numerous monuments for the entire nation to be proud of and approve of. When Napoleon returned to France he displayed his works of art and made it seem as it was a victory. This is a true testament to his abilities as a brilliant war strategist as well as further indoctrinating him as a hero.
His military leadership in the battle was recognized by the leaders of France and, at the young age of 24, he was promoted to the position of brigadier general. After his eventual defeat, his soldiers still considered him their true leader and helped him regain control of France. Furthermore, was this guy really a hero or just a bloody. His extravagant coronation in Notre Dame in December 1804 cost 8. Napoleon was, therefore, carrying out, without knowing, the Hegelian philosophy of history : instrument of the Absolute on the scene of the world, Napoleon was becoming the hero of modern history. In 1769 he was born in Corsica. He revolutionized warfare through unique tactics and innovative inventions.
In other countries across Europe, unless you were of noble status or were undoubtedly wealthy enough to marry into a noble blood line then you were reduced to a life of mediocrity and hard work at best. But it is also political because world history, ruled by the dialectic and progressive realization of freedom consists in the necessary transition from democracy to aristocracy, then to monarchy. Yet he knew the people wanted a show, so he wore extravagant outfits and lived in fancy palaces. Finally, Hegel expects the introduction of a Civil code. In conclusion, Napoleon Bonaparte, was more of a hero than tyrant.
The Facts in this case are clear; Officer Skagen was coming home from court that day, he was in plain clothes at the time of the incident in question. In campaign after campaign he defeated larger armies with a smaller force, through methods like moving boldly and quickly, defeating them in detail, cutting off their lines of retreat, and doing what his enemies least expected. When he came to power, the situation in France was really bad. Overall I think Napoleon was hero. People started to resist in the name of their country: that feeling is called nationalism, which is a patriotic feeling, principle or effort. But rather, he is a disciple of Machiavelli, who, in The Prince, demonstrates that States are historically established by a deed combining guile, strength and violence. He created them to educate future officers, administrators, and engineers under state control.
It only depends on your point of view. Upon Napoleon's return, he allied himself with a radical group of the revolutionaries called the Jacobins. Byrne Block 1 November 8, 2011 Napoleon: Hero or Villain Napoleon, the great French leader, is often seen as a hero, but if you look closer there is great evidence showing that he is a villain. Napoleon himself because King of Italy, his brother Louis became King of Holland and his brother Josepha became king of Naples. As winter approached, Napoleon's army ran out of supplies. History is never perfectly represented. He was able to rise to power through his great military victories and he was able to keep his power by fending off enemies in wars and with some reforms.
Actor of history, instrument of the Absolute, scholar among the ignorants, victim of historical necessity. Those closely associated with previous regimes stood little chance of power under the new government. After conquering Egypt in the , Napoleon founded the. Both sides have many points supporting that he was a hero and that he was a villain. Never before or since has France been greater or seen more brilliant victories than under Napoleon.
He seems to have done both. After completing his education, Napoleon went to France to become a solider. Always Learning The first characteristic of Napoleon is that he was diligent to always be improving himself and acquiring knowledge that would help him in future tasks. The combination of a ruthless police state and rigged elections became a staple of populist dictatorial regimes to the present. Many would argue that Napoleon is a hero as his heroic nature provided France with the institutions and sense of national identity they needed. The directory was not able to control well enough and that was when Napoleon Bonaparte became dictator and eventually became emperor.
In 1804, he was crowned the first Emperor France. But leadership, he personifies leadership, he is leadership: he is France. Thanks again Mike for letting me know and for considering reading one of my articles. He didn't care whether a person was of a common or aristocratic background, as long as they were good at what they did, and in this Napoleonic France differed from any other regime in France or Europe at the time. Also Napoleon established a means by which he could reward citizens for their services and loyalty. Is it possible that he was a heroic tyrant Or a tyrannical hero.