A few notes on the Reasoning point. The second point is a trickier. Point-of-view goes beyond just the individual author of a document, but the group that author represents. That way if you misuse one document, you still get the point. During the Civil War, the U. Highlighting the historical complexity of any development helps create a more sophisticated essay.
When the British caught on to colonial smuggling they began to crack down on smugglers with the Sugar Act of 1764. You must use at least six of the documents to support your thesis. The key to getting the point is to use your outside evidence to advance your argument. Again, to do this properly, you must be able to write at least a paragraph giving additional context on the specific documents. Essays that earn a medium score complete the essay task, but with no special insights; the analysis lacks depth and merely states the obvious. It states that British violated economic and natural rights and states the relative importance by elevating natural rights by stating that there is no liberty without protections of natural rights.
But the key point is- the more your evidence works together and is connected, the stronger the qualification, modification, or corroboration. After the Great War, Americans were disappointed to realize that the war was. Three things to know about Outside Evidence: 1 It must fall within the time period of the prompt. In your response, consider both the underlying forces and specific events that contributed to the growing support for independence. The Outside Evidence points states: Uses at least one additional piece of the specific historical evidence beyond that found in the documents relevant to an argument about the prompt.
They stated that only colonial legislatures had the power to tax within the colonies 2 Sam Adams, the leader of the Sons of Liberty who tried to bring about revolution, stated that the colonists enjoined all the rights of Englishmen, including protection of their property rights. The Stamp Act caused the largest outcry for it taxed many items and was a direct tax. Or, what caused the document to be created. They began in the 18 th century. One way to think about it: To what degree did the development influence the time period provided in the prompt. Background information are specific events that happened.
Your thesis must clearly state your evaluation of the extent of the historical development. Never before had the Parliament taxed colonial goods traded within and between colonies internal taxation. The important thing is that you demonstrate a strong understanding of all the evidence as well as how each piece is related to the other. George Washington also did not like these taxes and said that manufacturers would help American industry. And make sure to read this part. Events that showed these violations were acts such as the Stamp Act and Intolerable Acts. This context directly establishes the fundamental economic trend and why its monopolistic tendencies were a cause of the revolution.
This was in response to the Intolerable Acts and other taxes. This flexibility gives you room to write a thesis that explicitly addresses all parts of the question, makes an accurate and well-supported argument, and uses complex reasoning to illustrate historical relationships and reasoning. Thesis 2: The thesis is found in the introduction paragraph. However, in the name of fiscal responsibility, they increased defense spending. Unity was another issue arising during this time. How can you tell if your getting the point? The point of view of the cartoon is that of a Rebel. You may be asked to demonstrate how different types of evidence contradict one another, corroborate or strengthen one another, or change one another.
Docs 7, 5 and 6 are used in paragraph 5. Contextualization 1 Pt: Situates the argument by explaining the broader historical events, developments, or processes immediately relevant to the question. For over a century, the colonists had accepted the parliamentary taxes on foreign goods entering the colony external taxes for purposes of payment for British naval protection. So if the question is about, for example, warfare during the Civil War versus the French and Indian War, you must give enough background information about one or both of those events to convince the grader that you know what you are talking about when you make claims about one or both of those processes. Have you taken the idea of the document to advance your argument? They discovered that they could smuggle goods to the Spanish and French West Indies and make much larger profits than they could by only trading with the British West Indies. In other words, though you may have used outside evidence in the previous strand Document Analysis , you must now refer to additional evidence that explains the documents and their relationship to your broader historical argument.
These can include primary sources, secondary scholarship, images, text… You may not be familiar with all of the documents, but you must be able to use what you know either background information or context clues from the documents themselves in order to make a coherent historical argument that supports your thesis. What was it used for? To get the 1 st point, you simply must state the content of the document and relate it to the prompt. In 1775, a Tory wrote that colonists enjoyed the natural right of petitions and that the Crown and Parliament were listening to colonial concerns. In your response, consider both the underlying forces and specific events that contributed to the growing support for independence. Embed: This code would display the entire rubric within a frame on other websites. How would you contextualization the following prompts? There are two strands here. The British did not let the colonies have their own trade.
However, with the taxing of British West Indies sugar into the 13 mainland colonies under the 1764 Sugar Act Parliament had begun taxing goods traded between colonies and not just foreign goods. Taxes seemed to make them very angry. They know your arguments and how you see the development situated in the time period. The Reasoning point: Demonstrates a complex understanding of the historical development that is the focus of the prompt, using evidence to corroborate, qualify, or modify an argument that addresses the question. Remember: You must analyze three documents to get the point. Though the thesis is simplistic, it gets over the bar by making a claim it will try to substantiate. You cannot merely summarize the information that is already in the documents, but must instead give an account of the relevant historical time periods or evidence.
The thesis sets the tone for the whole essay and clearly outlines the arguments the essay will defend. Document Analysis 0-2 points This strand of the rubric targets your ability to analyze evidence and use the evidence to support the argument laid out in your thesis. Flashcards that list the salient facts about a big event or relevant document can be very helpful here. . Again, all discussions of the documents must demonstrate that you can use the documents to strengthen your argument and support your thesis.